Duty to ActImmunityMunicipal LiabilityNegligence

$3.2 Million Death Settlement in Chicago

The City of Chicago just settled a wrongful death case for $3.2 million.

The suit resulted from an incident where a Chicago engine company responded on a medical emergency, and the defibrillator did not work. The defibrillator failure that was attributed to the fact that the batteries were not replaced every 2 years as
recommended by the manufacturer. The patient died despite CPR being initiated almost immediately by his son, an off-duty firefighter.

The case raises a number of interesting issues:

  1. Could the City have been found liable at trial in the absence of proof that “but for” the dated batteries, the decedent would have survived? In legal parlance, the question is framed a bit differently – and focuses on whether the batteries were the proximate cause of the dead.
  2. Does the City have immunity for such an occurrence?
  3. Did the City owe the decedent a legal duty, and if so was it a public duty or a special duty?

The settlement means none of these issues will be explored, but the case raises another interesting question: What is the duty of other fire apparatus that do not even have defibrillators? Is there a legal duty to have a functioning AED on board every engine company?

The engine company in question had an AED. If a fire company is not required to have an AED, but has one – does that create a duty to ensure that the AED is functional? 

Curt Varone

Curt Varone has over 50 years of fire service experience and 40 as a practicing attorney licensed in both Rhode Island and Maine. His background includes 29 years as a career firefighter in Providence (retiring as a Deputy Assistant Chief), as well as volunteer and paid on call experience. Besides his law degree, he has a MS in Forensic Psychology. He is the author of two books: Legal Considerations for Fire and Emergency Services, (2006, 2nd ed. 2011, 3rd ed. 2014, 4th ed. 2022) and Fire Officer's Legal Handbook (2007), and is a contributing editor for Firehouse Magazine writing the Fire Law column.

Related Articles

One Comment

  1. I would imagine that the Fire Department does have the same duty as a hospital to make sure that they equipment is operating as it should. FF and EMS are first responders and need to be ready at a moments notice in the event of incidents such as the Boston Marathon Bombing. Having an AED (even when not required to do such) counts as Apparatus and needs to be cared for with the same care you would give to your trucks and turnout gear.

    The AED can be the difference between life and death and needs to be maintained with the same level of care. This is just an opinion from a person that has taken the time to certify in CPR and First Aid.

Back to top button