Skip to content


LA Captain Accused of Bogus Payroll Scheme

A Los Angeles fire captain is on paid administrative leave as the LAFD investigates how he was able to receive nearly $80,000 in additional compensation from the department in 2010. Captain Eric Vasquez was assigned to supervise time sheet recordkeeping, and is alleged to have found a way to receive compensation for roughly 23 weeks of vacation time plus his regular salary.

In 2010 Vasquez received $185,645, while in 2009 he received $168,494. The discrepancies were discovered when the department switched from a manual to a computerized time tracking system. LAWeekly took a sarcastic swipe at the LAFD over the story, suggesting that perhaps Vasquez had been “chalking up some extra hours on his caveman’s tablet” prior to the computer upgrade.

 

 It goes without saying that much of the public believes the kind of financial abuse that is alleged here, is rampant both in the fire service, and in public employment in general.  No doubt many earnestly believe it is the type of misconduct that is feeding the current economic crisis. We can say that such cases are a rarity – and indeed they are – but the damage to every firefighter from LA to NY when these stories are aired is incalculable. Once again, we are our own worst enemy.

More on the story.

Posted in Criminal Law, Disciplinary Action, Wage and Hour, You Can't Make This Stuff Up

Tagged , , , ,

Retirement Buyout Leads to Indiana Suit

Today’s burning question: My fire department offered me a $26,000 buyout to retire. If I take it, does the $26,000 include accrued vacation time, or can I still get paid for the time I have on the books?  That question is that the heart of a lawsuit filed by seven firefighters in Logansport, Indiana.

Steve Crispen, William Hassett, Randy Landis, Kim Costello, Rex Danely, David Huff, and James McMinn filed suit on July 28, 2011, claiming “Under Indiana law, an agreement to give vacation pay to employees made before they perform their services, and based upon length of service and time worked, is not a gratuity, but rather is in form of compensation for services” that must be paid in accordance with the Indiana Wage Payment Act in addition to any other required compensation.

The city of Logansport answered the complaint on September 23, 2011 denying the allegations and disagreeing with the firefighters’ “characterization of Indiana law, which is a matter for the court’s determination.” Among the points of contention: can vacation time be carried over from year to year, and when exactly does vacation time accrue.

The city claims that a Logansport ordinance “provides that vacation leave is allotted during the calendar year and does not accumulate or carry over to the following calendar year.” The firefighters contend that vacation time accrues the year prior to being used. In other words, a firefighter is granted X weeks vacation on January 1, 2011 by virtue of having worked January 1 to December 31, 2010.

The retiring firefighters are alleging they are owed 6 weeks of vacation, equaling roughly $4,500 per retiree.

More on the story.

Posted in Burning Question, Civil Suit, Pensions

Tagged , , ,