Skip to content


Cracking Jubblies Comment on Facebook Leads to Medic Being Disciplined

Not sure how we missed this one back in April when the decision came down, but a British Paramedic was found guilty of misconduct for posting a remark on his Facebook page indicating that he “copped a feel” while on a run.

Paramedic Mark Small of the Great Western Ambulance Service was accused of misconduct for a post he made following a shift on June 28, 2011. The comment was reportedly: “Saved someone’s life and managed to cop a feel of some cracking jubblies.”

Following the posting, Small was suspended from work. He was later reinstated when it was determined that he never actually touched anyone… he apparently was just bragging that he had. The UK’s Health Professions Council reviewed his case and concluded Small’s conduct was “irresponsible, immature and highly unprofessional”. He was given an official caution that will remain on his record for 3 years.

Isn’t it nice to know that it’s not just us who are struggling with social media…

More on the story.

Posted in Disciplinary Action, EMS, Humor, International, Social Media, You Can't Make This Stuff Up

Tagged , , , ,

Baltimore Medics Deny Transport to Seeing Eye Dog

A Baltimore city paramedic crew is in hot water over their treatment of a blind veteran and his service dog after the man was struck by an auto.

Curtis Graham, Jr., a Vietnam Vet, was on his way to the Veteran’s day parade on November 11, 2011 when the injury occurred. Graham claims that city paramedics refused to transport him with his dog.

Both the Americans with Disabilities Act and Maryland state law prohibit discrimination against a disabled person with a service animal. Service dogs are allowed to go anywhere that a person can go. That means anywhere – including restaurants, airplanes, hotels, theaters, and – yes – ambulances.

This is from the Maryland Code, Title VII:

§ 7-705. Service animals

In general

(a) The following individuals have all the same rights and privileges conferred by law on other individuals:

(1) a blind or visually impaired pedestrian using a service animal …

(2) a deaf or hard of hearing pedestrian using a service animal …

(3) a blind, visually impaired, deaf, or hard of hearing pedestrian using a service animal in a place, accommodation, or conveyance listed in § 7-704(b) of this subtitle; and

(4) a service animal trainer who is accompanied by an animal that is being trained as a service animal.

Mobility impaired individual accompanied by a service animal

(b)(1) A mobility impaired individual may be accompanied by a service animal specially trained for that purpose in any place where a blind, visually impaired, deaf, or hard of hearing individual has the right to be accompanied by a service animal.

(2) This subsection does not require a physical modification of any place or vehicle in order to admit a mobility impaired individual who is accompanied by a service animal. …

Extra compensation prohibited; liability

(d)(1) A blind, visually impaired, deaf, hard of hearing, or mobility impaired individual who is accompanied by a service animal specially trained for that purpose in a place, accommodation, or conveyance listed in § 7-704(b) of this subtitle may not be required to pay extra compensation for the service animal, but the individual may be liable for any damages to the premises or facilities caused by the service animal. …

Violations; penalties

(e)(1)(i) A person may not deny or interfere with the admittance of a service animal that accompanies a blind, visually impaired, deaf, hard of hearing, or mobility impaired individual in violation of this section.

(ii) A person who violates subparagraph (i) of this paragraph is guilty of a misdemeanor and on conviction is subject to a fine not exceeding $500 for each offense.

(2)(i) A person may not deny or interfere with the admittance of an animal being trained as a service animal that accompanies a service animal trainer.

(ii) Subject to subsection (c)(2) of this section, a person who violates subparagraph (i) of this paragraph is subject to a fine not exceeding $25 for each offense. 

§ 7-704. Rights of individuals with disabilities

(a) Individuals with disabilities and the parents of a minor child with a disability have the same right as individuals without disabilities to the full and free use of the roads, sidewalks, public buildings, public facilities, and other public places.

(b)(1) Individuals with disabilities and the parents of a minor child with a disability are entitled to full and equal rights and privileges with respect to common carriers and other public conveyances or modes of transportation, places of public accommodations, and other places to which the general public is invited, subject only to any conditions and limitations of general application established by law.

 

Graham has filed a complaint with the US Justice Department, and the Baltimore City Fire Department has launched an investigation. Incidentally, most states have a law similar to Maryland’s law that allows service dogs to go anywhere their master goes. The laws generally extend to all service animals, including USAR canines, police service dogs, arson dogs, and dogs for the visual, hearing, and mobility impaired.

If nothing else this story should prompt a brief training module on service dogs to be added to EMS training programs.

11/29/11  5:30 pm. The story was updated a few minutes ago when 2 Baltimore FD officials visited Mr. Graham to apologize, and assure him that additional training will be provided to all personnel on the proper treatment of service dogs.

Posted in ADA, Disciplinary Action, Discrimination, EMS, You Can't Make This Stuff Up

Tagged , , , , ,

Chicago Ambulance Stolen with EMS Personnel and Patient Inside

Did the headline catch your eye? Sounds pretty interesting, right? We all assume good journalists covering such a story would fully develop the facts before they print headlines like that, right?

What happened in Chicago on Saturday was initially reported as the malicious theft of an ambulance while paramedics were in the back treating a patient. The story was made juicier by the fact that the thief had a lengthy criminal record, a “perp photo” released by police made him look like a stereotypical criminal, and a CFD ladder truck was able to heroically block the street to prevent the criminal from absconding with the ambulance.

The truth about what happened …. not as juicy. No… Just the same kind of poor judgment and bad decisionmaking that keeps firefighters (and lawyers) busy 24/7…365 days a year.

On Saturday, October 9, 2010 at about 11:30 am, while EMS personnel attended to a relative with a diabetic condition, 27-year-old Jimmy McCoy grew concerned about the length of time the ambulance was parked in the street. He decided to get involved by driving the ambulance to the hospital himself while the paramedics worked on his relative. Unfortunately for him, he did not inform the paramedics about what he was doing. In the ensuing moments he was arrested and sent to jail on $50,000 bond, charged with felony possession of a stolen motor vehicle.

Here’s more on the storyAnd more.  And more.

Posted in Criminal Law, EMS, You Can't Make This Stuff Up

Tagged , , ,

County City Squabble Ends Fire Based Paramedic Service in Stockton

A four year battle with between the City of Stockton and San Joaquin County over EMS has resulted in the Stockton Fire Department having to discontinue paramedic level services that have been provided for over three decades. This case is one of several in California involving a dispute between counties and local government over EMS delivery by firefighters.

State law grants the authority to coordinate EMS services to the county, but provides that fire departments that provided a service dating back to June 1, 1980 were grandfathered. For those who have a copy of Fire Officer’s Legal Handbook, see the case in Chapter 3 of County of San Bernadino v. City of San Bernadino,  15 Cal. 4th 909, 938 P2d 876, (1997).

  

Posted in Civil Suit, EMS

Tagged , ,

Pennsylvania Paramedic Arrested for Interfering with Police Tasering of Patient

A Pennsylvania paramedic has been charged with disorderly conduct and obstructing a police officer in regards to an incident which occurred last April.

Paramedic Jodi L. Kerr-Rummel of the Lower Burrell Volunteer Fire Company No. 3  pled not guilty to the charges, and was in court again last week on August 25, 2010 seeking to have the charges dismissed. She is alleged to have interfered with a police officer who was attempting to Taser a combative female patient on an EMS run on April 9. 2010.

Kerr-Rummel’s attorney, James Michael Fox, asked the court to dismiss the charges, arguing that his client  "didn't think it was appropriate" for the patient to be  Tasered. Judge Cheryl Peck Yakopec  refused the request and the matter will now proceed to trial.

More on the story.

Posted in Criminal Law, Duty to Act, EMS, Police-Fire, You Can't Make This Stuff Up

Tagged , , , ,