Skip to content


Controversial NY LODD Case Settles

It appears that a settlement has been reached in a controversial wrongful death lawsuit filed by the widow of an upstate New York firefighter who died at a house fire 10 years ago.

On March 7, 2002 Fayetteville firefighter Timothy Lynch, 28, and Manlius firefighter John Ginocchetti, 41, died when a floor collapsed at a house fire. Lynch’s widow, Donna Prince Lynch, filed suit against the property owner, Onondaga County, and the fire departments involved. She accused the county and fire departments of mismanaging the incident, and allowing unsafe operations that caused the death.

The case garnered considerable attention as it wound its way through the New York state court system. One series of headlines were prompted by a decision that the failure to comply with NIMS ICS can serve as a basis for liability under NY General Municipal Law § 205-a. That statute provides NY firefighters who are injured in the line of duty with a right to sue those who violate a law or legal requirement. § 205-a states:

“ …in the event any accident, causing injury, death or a disease which results in death, occurs directly or indirectly as  a  result  of  any  neglect, omission,  willful  or  culpable  negligence of any person or persons in failing to  comply  with  the  requirements  of  any  of  the  statutes,  ordinances,  rules,  orders  and  requirements  of  the  federal, state, county, village, town or city governments or of any  and  all  their departments, divisions and bureaus, the person or persons guilty of said neglect, omission, willful or culpable negligence at the time of such injury or death shall be liable to pay any  officer,  member,  agent  or   employee of any fire department injured…”

The case later generated even more headlines when an appellate court ruled that a state law granting immunity to protection to firefighters does not protect fire departments or high ranking fire department officials. As such, the suit against the departments and a number of command level officers could continue.

The settlement is reported to be $1.2 million, with Onondaga County contributing $863,000, and the Manlius and Pompey Hill fire departments paying the remaining $337,000. The settlement must be approved by the county’s legislative body.

More on the story.

Posted in Civil Suit, Immunity, LODD, Municipal Liability, Negligence, Occupational Safety & Health, Wrongful death

Tagged , , , , , ,

Velarde Fire Chief Takes Aim At Sheriff and EMA Director

The strange case of the New Mexico fire chief who was arrested at an incident scene as a way to relieve him of command, is in the news again - this time with an entirely new twist.

Fire Chief Eddie Velarde, of the Velarde Fire Department, was arrested by Rio Arriba County Sheriff’s Lieutenant Adam Archuleta on March 29, 2011 and charged with disorderly conduct. At the time Chief Velarde was the incident commander at a 3.2 acre interface fire that damaged 3 structures and 3 vehicles.

According to the headlines at the time of the arrest, Archuleta claimed Chief Velarde was out of control and his arrest was done in the interests of public safety. Archuleta later charged Chief Velarde with concealing his identity and obstructing a sheriff’s officer. The allegations made national news and caused considerable embarrassment, humiliation, and stress for Chief Velarde personally and the Velarde Fire Department.

Chief Velarde and his attorney, Diego Zamora, vehemently contested the criminal charges. At his trial last July, Chief Velarde was acquitted of all three charges. According to Zamora, under cross examination Archuleta was at a loss to explain how someone he had known for over a decade could attempt to “conceal his identity” – the basis for 2 of the 3 charges.

Also at issue in the case is the role played by county EMA director Mateo DeVargas, with whom Chief Velarde has had past run-ins. DeVargas was assigned to coordinate evacuation of the fire area, establish perimeter control, and track arriving resources. Chief Velarde claims that following his arrest, he heard Archuleta state “Mateo, you got what you wanted, you are now incident commander.”

The case entered an entirely new phase this week when Zamora and co-counsel Patrick Brito filed a civil suit against Archuleta, DeVargus and Rio Arriba County alleging false arrest, false imprisonment, malicious abuse of process, defamation, and conspiracy. The allegations, if proven, are a serious indictment of law enforcement in Rio Arriba County.

The suit was filed on Wednesday. Here is a copy of the complaint: Complaint-VELARDE

It is a good read. The case raises a number of important concerns – not the least of which are the ICS implications of subordinate law enforcement authorities arresting an IC because they question his actions. For news on the story.

Posted in Civil Suit, Criminal Law, Municipal Liability, Police-Fire, Politics, Volunteers, Wrongful Arrest, You Can't Make This Stuff Up

Tagged , , , , , ,