Skip to content


New Haven Firefighter Claims Light Duty Discrimination

The New Haven Fire Department is facing another discrimination charge, this time from a firefighter who claims he was “mercilessly” discriminated against while in training because he was asked to paint fire hydrants, mop floors and wash windows.

Aaron Brantley filed the complaint with the Connecticut State Commission on Human Rights alleging race discrimination. He claims he suffered a shoulder injury, and was asked to do these outrageous tasks while on light duty in May of 2011.

The complaint names the City of New Haven, New Haven Fire Department, Assistant Fire Chief Patrick Egan and Capt. Mark Marcarelli who heads the training division and alleges that Brantley was transferred to different firehouses, ordered to paint 25 to 30 fire hydrants, mop floors, and even instructed to wash windows at the fire training school while it was raining.

Brantley claims he was on light duty at the time, with doctor’s orders restricting him from any repetitive motion with his right arm and lifting more than 21 pounds of weight. Brantley’s attorney, Patricia Cofrancesco, said that the department’s action amounted to “hazing” and went “beyond the pale” of reasonable light-duty work, all because Brantley is Black.

Fire department officials have countered that the tasks assigned to Brantley were all reasonable light duty assignments. Capt.  Marcarelli denied ordering Brantley to wash the training academy’s windows in the rain, referring to the allegation as “false” and “ridiculous”.

Chief Egan was quoted as saying “For $50 an hour, I don’t think it is a whole lot to ask someone to do … The fact is, when people are at work, they’re going to work.”

More on the story.

Posted in Civil Suit, Constitutional Rights, Discrimination, Municipal Liability, Occupational Safety & Health, Workers Compensation

Tagged , , ,

Iowa Firefighter Alleges Pregnancy Discrimination Over Denial of Light Duty

A Clinton, Iowa firefighter has filed a gender and pregnancy discrimination suit because she was not granted a light duty position to accommodate her pregnancy.

Karen McQuistion is a firefighter with the Clinton Fire Department who became pregnant last spring. On May 11, 2011 she notified Fire Chief Mark Regenwether, and requested that her condition be accommodated by a transfer to a light duty position. That request was denied due to the financial condition of the city, and McQuistion continued to work on the line until September 29, 2011 when her doctor advised her to take leave.

In October 2011, McQuistion filed discrimination charges against the city with the Iowa Civil Rights Commission, and received a right to sue letter.

The lawsuit, filed in Clinton County District Court on March 28, 2012, contains three counts: (1) gender and pregnancy discrimination under state law, (2) a violation of the Iowa state constitution’s equal protection clause, and (3) a violation of Iowa constitution’s due process clause. In what is no doubt a strategic move to keep the case out of Federal court, the complaint DOES NOT allege gender discrimination under Federal law, a violation of the Federal Pregnancy Discrimination Act, nor violations of McQuistion’s Federal Constitutional rights.

The suit alleges that Clinton police officers receive light duty accommodations for pregnancies, and that the fire department allows firefighters who are injured on the job to perform light duty, but denies that accommodation to pregnant firefighters.

The suit names City of Clinton, City Attorney Jeffrey Farwell, City Administrator Jeffrey Horne, and Fire Chief Mark Regenwether, who recently retired. It seeks compensatory damages to cover McQuistion’s lost wages, plus punitive damages “in an amount sufficient to punish the defendants and deter the defendants and others from the same or similar wrongful conduct.”

Here is a copy of the complaint. McQuistion v Clinton

As for the law in a nutshell: As a general rule, a pregnant employee cannot force an employer to create a light duty assignment. Thus if a fire department had no light duty positions, a pregnant firefighter would be out of luck. However, if an employer grants employees light duty assignments for medical and other reasons, it cannot refuse to accommodate an employee who seeks a light duty position on the basis of pregnancy.

More on the story.

Posted in Civil Suit, Constitutional Rights, Discrimination

Tagged , , , , , ,