Skip to content


Edison Firefighters Sue To Block Staffing Cuts

Firefighters in Edison Township, NJ have filed suit against the township alleging that staffing cuts are endangering citizens. The suit, which was filed in Superior Court in New Brunswick on Friday, October 29, 2010, alleges that the cuts constitute an abuse of power and violate local law.

The firefighter’s union president Robert Yackel, who took on the previous township administration  himself in a freedom of speech lawsuit in Federal court, has been vocal about the closing of an engine company and the reduction of staffing from 22 to 20 firefighters per shift. Yackel was quoted as saying “What’s especially troubling is that these decisions aren’t being made by fire department brass or even elected officials who live in Edison. They are coming from the business administrator’s office”.

For more on the story.

Posted in Civil Suit, Occupational Safety & Health, Politics, Staffing

Tagged , ,

Political Signs and Firefighters: 1st Amendment Case

A Federal Court in New Jersey last week ruled against a firefighter who claimed his department violated his 1st and 14th Amendment rights. Edison firefighter Peter Yackel parked his personal pickup truck in the parking lot of his firehouse on June 1, 2009 when he went to work. The problem was the truck bore a large political sign stating "Choi Lies! Save Public Safety In Edison." Also June 2, 2009 was election day, and Mayor Choi was seeking re-election. And city personnel rules prohibit engaging in political activities while on duty.

Later that day Yackel was instructed to move the truck, which he dutifully did. On June 3, 2009, he was informed he was suspended for 5 days. Within days Yackel sued Mayor Choi and the fire chief in Federal District Court alleging that the discipline violated his freedom of speech and the suspension without an opportunity for a hearing violated his due process rights. Yackel claimed the sign in his truck was protected speech about an important matter of public concern, and the discipline he received was retaliation.

In a well reasoned decision issued March 16, 2010, the court concluded that while the sign arguably did speak to matters of public concern, the 1st Amendment does not require that a public employee be allowed to engage in political advertising from public property while working as a public employee. In dispensing with the due process claims, the court said that while admittedly Yackel was not given a hearing before he was disciplined, he had adequate “post-deprivation” remedies to address his due process rights, including a union grievance procedure. Given that the penalty was only a five day suspension, due process did not require a pre-deprivation hearing.

Here is a copy of the written decision. Download Yackel-dismissal-opinion

No word on whether there will be an appeal. Incidentally, the Mayor lost the election.

Posted in Civil Suit, Disciplinary Action, First Amendment

Tagged , , ,