Skip to content


Ohio YCMTSU

A fire lieutenant with the Springfield Township, Ohio Fire Department has been terminated for a number of infractions, including showing a female colleague a lewd photo of his penis, and having pornography on his fire department computer.

Lt. Jason Bowman was terminated on April 16, 2013 for conduct unbecoming, dereliction of duty, and sexual harassment. Besides showing the female firefighter the photo (which occurred while on duty), he also allegedly sent her a sexually explicit text while off duty, and had pornographic videos on his fire department computer.

The Blade reported that Lt. Bowman had a troubled disciplinary record, including past discipline for:

  • failing to complete required equipment inspections,
  • failing to complete reports on time,
  • open arguments with officers about firefighting tactics,
  • failing to show for a scheduled shift,
  • tardiness,
  • sharing of his concerns about disciplinary decisions with subordinates, and
  • aggressive driving

More on the story.

Posted in Disciplinary Action, Sexual Harassment, Sexual misconduct, You Can't Make This Stuff Up

Tagged , , ,

LAFD Discipline Philosophy

One of the areas of my law practice that has been exceptionally busy over the past few years has been firefighter discipline. Many departments are experiencing unprecedented disciplinary issues – and while we can debate the various factors that are contributing to the increase – the more important question is what do we do about it?

Somehow we missed this story back in September, but the LAFD issued a report on its disciplinary struggles with a focus on the need for a new disciplinary philosophy.

The report details the recent struggles the department has had, the problems it is experiencing with the current process, the fact that the process remains a source of contention between the union and the administration, and the fact that the current process is viewed by firefighters, union officials and chiefs alike as punitive as opposed to being focused on changing behavior.

The report continues with remarkable honestly and bluntness: In the majority of LAFD sustained complaints … the LAFD has no intent to remove the member from service. Instead, the LAFD seeks to change the member’s behavior through the means available to it. Unfortunately, with punitive action as its only option, the currently disciplinary process and resulting discipline (after a prolonged investigation and adjudication) often leaves the member bitter about the process, without being given tools or training which might help them avoid a recurrence.

The report also notes the difficulty of resolving interpersonal relationship conflicts between members when the only solution that management has at hand is punitive (ie. to discipline one member or the other, or both).

The Professional Standards Division “believes that a focus on “modifying behavior” through corrective action and training is an appropriate goal for the LAFD’s discipline process and introduces this philosophical shift with a brief outline of existing strategies for consideration.”

The report recommends consideration of a number of alternative dispute resolution options, including:

  • Predisposition settlement agreements
  • Education based discipline
  • Conditional official reprimands
  • Mediation, and
  • Early intervention programs

The report goes on to briefly explain each of these options, and concludes that the LAFD would benefit greatly from this change in philosophy.

The report was prepared by LAFDs Professional Standards Division, carries the signature of Fire Chief Brian Cummings, and was submitted to the Board of Fire Commissioners of the City of Los Angeles on September 24, 2012.

Here is a copy of the report. lafdlafdreport186478912_09252012

The report echos a number of important points that modern police and fire discipline authorities have been advocating for decades, most importantly: that the purpose of discipline is to change behavior. All too often, discipline becomes solely focused on punishment – leading investigators to focus on how to “get” an accused  firefighter.

When punishment becomes the goal of discipline, the disciplinary system becomes the subject of scorn and discontent among firefighters. This can cause officers to refuse to use the process, and lead them to look the other way at misconduct. Ignoring misconduct in turn creates the potential for even more misconduct to occur as boundaries between right and wrong, acceptable and not acceptable conduct becomes blurred.

The new discipline philosophy is often associated with the term “professional standards” as opposed to the more traditional term “internal affairs”. In LAFD’s case, it appears they adopted the professional standards name at some point in the past without truly adopting the professional standards philosophy. Be that as it may – it would appear that changes are on the horizon.

I applaud Chief Cummings for having the vision and the courage to advocate these changes. We will be discussing these very disciplinary philosophy issues later this month in Las Vegas during the 5 Day Internal Affairs program (part of PATC’s Western States Conference), and again next month on Hilton Head Island for Fire Department Administrative Investigations and Enforcing Discipline… (2 day program).

Posted in Disciplinary Action, Labor Law

Tagged , , , , , ,

The Discipline Debacle in DC

It is almost beyond belief, even for someone who lectures regularly on the subject of “You Can’t Make This Stuff Up”. A fire chief, Kenneth Ellerbe, disciplining two chief officers who serve as hearing officers – administrative fact finders – because the fire chief feels they did not properly issue the correct “recommendation” to him in two disciplinary cases arising out of the same incident… Really?

Rather than rewrite the facts of the cases – Here are some links to the various stories – the Washington Times article does a great job of summarizing the facts.

 

While the facts are complicated and convoluted – one battalion chief, Richard Sterne, was demoted to captain because he “recommended” issuing reprimands to two firefighters instead of the 24 hour suspensions the chief sought, and another battalion chief, Kevin Sloan, was transferred from a line position to a desk job in supply because he recommended a finding of not guilty for a lieutenant.

Here is the bottom line: In DC the fire chief is the final decision maker on matters of discipline. If the fire chief does not like recommendations that his subordinate chiefs give him, he should IGNORE THEM. He is the fire chief and that is his prerogative to overrule their decisions by issuing what ever punishment he believes is warranted.

But to punish fact finders for disagreeing with him? What message does that send? Perhaps the chief “thinks” it sends a message that “my chiefs need to get tough”…. Unfortunately the message that is being sent is – If the chief thinks someone is guilty, best agree with him or else you will be next. That is just plan wrong. That is bullying, plain and simple. Why bother with the farce of even having a chief officer issue a disciplinary recommendation if the fire chief has already pre-determined how it should come out? And by the way… due process means an accused has the right to a neutral decisionmaker… how exactly does the DC Fire & EMS provide that given the present circumstances?

And perhaps the real question – has Chief Ellerbe finally imploded? Will this discipline debacle be the straw that finally breaks the camel’s back?

Dave Statter has some more info on this case.

Posted in Constitutional Rights, Disciplinary Action, First Amendment, Labor Law, You Can't Make This Stuff Up

Tagged , , , , , , ,

Washington DC Fire Dept Investigates Nude Cooking Incident in Firehouse

I am not sure there is much to add to this headline or story. You can't make this stuff up.

View more news videos at: http://www.nbcwashington.com/video.

Posted in Apparatus, Disciplinary Action, You Can't Make This Stuff Up

Tagged , ,

Lawrence, Indiana Firefighter Fired for Sexual Harassment

A Lawrence, Indiana firefighter has been terminated for sexual harassment. Michael Rude was accused of a lengthy list of inappropriate conduct. The Lawrence Merit board rendered its decision on September 1, 2010 after numerous witnesses came forward to describe his conduct, which included groping, repeated inappropriate sexual comments, and entering female only areas of the fire station.

Rude's defense was that sexually explicit language was common in the Lawrence Fire Department. The Merit Board found him guilty of eight of the nine allegations.

Posted in Disciplinary Action, Sexual Harassment

Tagged , ,

Noose at Rocky Mountain Fire Academy Sparks Investigation

A noose found at the Rocky Mountain Fire Academy in Denver, Colorado earlier this year has sparked an investigation and calls for punishment. The facility, which trains firefighters from Denver and Aurora, is physically located in Denver.

Officials have apparently identified the firefighter involved and are contemplating what to do in terms of punishment or sensitivity training. The firefighter claims it was a joke related to him being assigned to undergo training, and was not racially motivated. However, the historical connection between the noose and racism makes it difficult for officials to ignore. For more on the story:

Posted in Disciplinary Action, Discrimination

Tagged , ,

LA Assistant Chief Sentenced in Puppy Beating Case

A former LA County Assistant Chief narrowly escaped a jail sentence earlier this month after he was convicted of animal cruelty in the beating of a neighbor's dog in 2008.

Chief Glynn Johnson alleged he was acting in self defense when the 6 month old puppy bit him, nearly severing his thumb. However, a jury found him guilty of felony animal cruelty in January, 2010. Between the time of the incident and the trial, Chief Johnson retired from the fire department.

Chief Johnson was sentenced on April 2, 2010, but his attorney said they plan to appeal.

 

Posted in Criminal Law, Disciplinary Action

Tagged , ,

Fort Worth Captain Accepts Demotion – But Keeps His Job

A Fort Worth Fire Captain has accepted a 2 step demotion, but has been permitted to keep his job as a result of a settlement of the civil service appeal of his termination.

Captain Steven Perez was fired on June 15, 2009 after an investigation concluded that he stole equipment from the fire department to use on his personal fire truck, and at least initially tried to blame a lieutenant for the missing equipment.  The lieutenant confronted Perez about the allegations, and subsequently filed a complaint with the department. Among the items allegedly taken were axes, pike poles and a rotary saw.

An administrative investigation was carried out in the case, resulting in Perez's termination. The police investigated, but declined to press charges. Perez appealed his termination through the civil service process and a settlement was reached. Under the agreement, Perez’s  termination was reduced to 167 day suspension, along with a demotion to fire engineer. He returned to work November 30, 2009. 

Posted in Disciplinary Action

Tagged , , ,