Skip to content


Clinton EMS Overbilling Case Is Now A Legal Malpractice Case

Some light has been shed on the inner details of the nasty battle in the Clinton, Iowa Fire Department over the EMS overbilling allegations that led to a $4.5 million fraud settlement, the fire chief being dismissed then reinstated, and a legal malpractice suit being filed against the city’s attorneys.

At least as outlined in the malpractice lawsuit, the lion’s share of the blame for what occurred falls upon the attorneys who supposedly investigated the overbilling allegations, concluded the city’s liability was in excess of $100 million, and recommended the city settle the case by paying $4.5 million back to the US government.

Upon further investigation, it appears that the fire department did not commit fraud, and that the mistakes that occurred (if any) were within the realm of normal, creating a maximum potential liability of just over $100,000.

Recall that Fire Chief Mark Regenwether and EMS director Andrew McGovern were blamed for the overbilling problem and fired back in 2010. Both were later reinstated with backpay. The details of the case help to explain what happened and why they were initially made out to be scapegoats.

The Clinton Herald published an excellent overview of what occurred, but essentially:

  • On September 19, 2008, Clinton firefighter Timothy Schultheis filed a Federal False Claims Act suit alleging Medicare fraud in Clinton’s EMS billing practices. He claimed BLS runs were being billed at ALS rates. The suit was sealed by a Federal Court as the matter was investigated.
  • On September 10, 2009, the United States chose not to intervene in suit and the suit became public on September 19, 2009.
  • Facing the suit, the city hired the law firm of Hopkins and Heubner PC to defend it; they investigated, concluded city had major liability exposure potentially exceeding $100 million, and advised the city to settle the case. Critical to that decision was that 95% of Clinton’s runs were billed as ALS while the national average was 60%.
  • On September 22, 2010 the Schultheis case was settled with an agreement to pay $4.5 million to the US, 30% of which would go to Schultheis.
  • In October 2010 Chiefs Regenwether and McGovern were fired.
  • In December 2010 Chiefs Regenwether and McGovern were reinstated as it appeared the settlement was based on flawed information. Further researched revealed that after new “Medicare approved” billing practices were instituted the ALS-BLS split was 86 percent ALS and 14 percent BLS, and at most created a liability of $108,000.
  • In March 2012 – the city of Clinton filed a lawsuit against Hopkins & Heubner for malpractice, alleging “It was negligent for defendants to have reasonably believed that any court or jury actually would have penalized the city in the amount of $10,000 to $15,000 [per run] for an inadvertent $45 [per run] overcharge to Medicare.” 

Here is a copy of the malpractice suit. City of Clinton v

Posted in Civil Suit, Disciplinary Action, EMS, Municipal Liability, Negligence, Politics, Wrongful termination

Tagged , , , , ,

Iowa Firefighter Alleges Pregnancy Discrimination Over Denial of Light Duty

A Clinton, Iowa firefighter has filed a gender and pregnancy discrimination suit because she was not granted a light duty position to accommodate her pregnancy.

Karen McQuistion is a firefighter with the Clinton Fire Department who became pregnant last spring. On May 11, 2011 she notified Fire Chief Mark Regenwether, and requested that her condition be accommodated by a transfer to a light duty position. That request was denied due to the financial condition of the city, and McQuistion continued to work on the line until September 29, 2011 when her doctor advised her to take leave.

In October 2011, McQuistion filed discrimination charges against the city with the Iowa Civil Rights Commission, and received a right to sue letter.

The lawsuit, filed in Clinton County District Court on March 28, 2012, contains three counts: (1) gender and pregnancy discrimination under state law, (2) a violation of the Iowa state constitution’s equal protection clause, and (3) a violation of Iowa constitution’s due process clause. In what is no doubt a strategic move to keep the case out of Federal court, the complaint DOES NOT allege gender discrimination under Federal law, a violation of the Federal Pregnancy Discrimination Act, nor violations of McQuistion’s Federal Constitutional rights.

The suit alleges that Clinton police officers receive light duty accommodations for pregnancies, and that the fire department allows firefighters who are injured on the job to perform light duty, but denies that accommodation to pregnant firefighters.

The suit names City of Clinton, City Attorney Jeffrey Farwell, City Administrator Jeffrey Horne, and Fire Chief Mark Regenwether, who recently retired. It seeks compensatory damages to cover McQuistion’s lost wages, plus punitive damages “in an amount sufficient to punish the defendants and deter the defendants and others from the same or similar wrongful conduct.”

Here is a copy of the complaint. McQuistion v Clinton

As for the law in a nutshell: As a general rule, a pregnant employee cannot force an employer to create a light duty assignment. Thus if a fire department had no light duty positions, a pregnant firefighter would be out of luck. However, if an employer grants employees light duty assignments for medical and other reasons, it cannot refuse to accommodate an employee who seeks a light duty position on the basis of pregnancy.

More on the story.

Posted in Civil Suit, Constitutional Rights, Discrimination

Tagged , , , , , ,