Skip to content


Pennsylvania Fire Company and Driver Sued for Apparatus Accident

A volunteer firefighter and his fire company have been sued over a vehicle accident last summer that severely injured an 8 year old boy.

Timothy and Jennifer Kolodychak filed suit last week in Westmoreland County Common Pleas Court against Rostraver Township, Rostraver Central Volunteer Fire Department, and Assistant Chief Justin Shawley alleging negligence.

Eight-year-old Logan Kolodychak suffered traumatic brain and facial injuries hat required reconstructive surgery and left him permanently scarred. His mother Jennifer, who was driving at the time, was also injured in the crash. Logan’s 11 year old sister was also in the vehicle and is alleged to have been traumatized but was physically uninjured.

The accident occurred on July 4, 2012 as Chief Shawley was driving a ladder truck on a run. The firefighters on board stated their emergency lights and siren were activated. According to police reports, the ladder approached the intersection where the accident occurred cautiously due to a red traffic light. When traffic was stopped Chief Shawley proceeded slowly through the intersection and was halfway through when the Kolodychak’s vehicle collided with the ladder.

The Kolodychak’s suit claims that Chief Shawley was driving at an unsafe speed, failed to maintain proper lookout, and failed to properly control the vehicle. They also allege the ladder was not responding to a fire or emergency at the time, and failed to use audible warning devices.

Neither driver was cited by police for the accident.

More on the accident.

More on the suit.

Posted in Apparatus, Civil Suit, Municipal Liability, Negligence, Volunteers

Tagged , , , , , , ,

Fire Law Headlines in FDNY and Dallas

Its been a busy few days from the Fire Law perspective and I am trying to catch up with some of the major headlines from across the country.

The city of New York received a favorable ruling from the 2nd Circuit yesterday in the historic FDNY race discrimination lawsuit. The FDNY had been crucified for the past three years in Federal District Court by the trial judge, Nicholas Garaufis.

Judge Garaufis ruled that not only had the city committed unintentional discrimination (disparate impact… ie. statistical discrimination) in its selection process for FDNY, but that by continuing to use a selection process that showed a disparate impact over the course of decades the city committed intentional (disparate treatment) discrimination.

Based on the unintentional (disparate impact) discrimination, Judge Garaufis invalidated the use of tests that showed a disparate impact, and ordered the appointment of a Special Master to oversee the hiring process. Due to the intentional (disparate treatment) discrimination finding he ordered a more “robust” array of remedial actions, including racial preferences/hiring quotas, $128 million in damages to be paid to minority applicants who were not selected, and the creation of an oversight monitor for 10 years to ensure necessary changes were implemented.

The city did not appeal the disparate impact finding, but rather focused narrowly on Judge Garaufis’ disparate treatment finding. The city also alleged that the judge had lost his objectivity in the case.

The 2nd Circuit agreed with the city that the finding of intentional discrimination (disparate treatment) was improper, and sent that part of the case back for a trial on the merits. The court concluded Judge Garaufis had not lost his objectivity, but ruled he should not preside over the trial.

The court reversed all of Judge Garaufis’ remedies associated with the disparate treatment finding, although the court agreed the oversight monitor should remain in effect for five years.

Since the ruling both sides have been declaring victory. New York City Corporation Counsel Michael A. Cardozo released a statement saying: “We are extremely pleased that the Second Circuit recognized significant problems in the manner in which the District Court handled the case.”

An attorney for the plaintiffs, Dana Lossia, countered that “The court monitor will oversee the FDNY’s hiring practices until 2017. That type of order is only issued and affirmed if there is a true serious issue.”

Here is a copy of the ruling. US v City of New York

More on the story.

 

And briefly…. Dallas Fire-Rescue reached a settlement in the 2009 sexual harassment suit filed by Leanne Siri-Edwards. Siri-Edwards was the civilian executive who was brought in to help newly hire Fire Chief Eddie Burns manage the department.

The lawsuit claimed that “Pervasive, severe, outrageous and obscene acts of discrimination, hostility, disrespect and harassment by [Dallas Fire-Rescue] leaders have slowly dismantled [Siri-Edwards’] reputation and her spirit."

The settlement calls for Siri-Edwards to be paid $390,000.

More on the story.

For my homies… I will get to the North Kingstown ruling by weeks end.  I am still trying to digest the ruling… despite the sense of nausea I get reading it… I keep telling myself "we are a country of laws, not men"… but all too often we see judges who let their political ideology corrupt their reasoning… but I digress.

Posted in Civil Suit, Constitutional Rights, Discrimination, Municipal Liability, Politics, Sexual Harassment

Tagged , , , , ,

Jury Awards Two Camden Firefighters $596k for Discrimination

Two Hispanic firefighters from Camden have been awarded $596,000 by a New Jersey jury for discrimination.

Firefighters Andres Nieves, 48, and Samuel Munoz, 34, claim they were subjected to a hostile work environment and they were unfairly passed over for promotion to captain in 2009 because they are Hispanic.

Back in 2009 Nieves and Munoz were next up on the promotion list when it expired. There were vacancies at the time but the promotions were not made until a new list was established.

Among the other allegations according to Philly.com, Munoz claims at fires he was unfairly required to spend too much time on the nozzle without a break. [Did I really say that with a straight face…]

Last Thursday, a state court jury awarded Nieves $390,000 in damages and Munoz's $206,000. The awards were intended to compensate the firefighters for lost wages, compensation for retaliation, and damages for having to work in a hostile environment.

More on the story.

 

Posted in Civil Suit, Constitutional Rights, Discrimination, Municipal Liability, Politics, Promotions

Tagged , , , , ,

Texas Firefighter Sues For Comp Disability

A Texas firefighter who was terminated while recuperating from a back injury has filed suit seeking $1 million in damages.

University Park Fire Department Paramedic Brad Tucker, 31, was injured on October 20, 2011 while lifting a patient. He had been on workers compensation recuperating until February 2012 when the City of University Park stopped both his compensation and medical coverage.

According to the lawsuit, the city acted “unilaterally and without any legitimate basis”. The city is self-insured for comp purposes.

Tucker retained an attorney who appealed the decision to the Texas Board of Insurance, Workers Compensation Division.  The Workers Comp Division ordered the city to reinstate both Tucker’s compensation and health benefits.

Thereafter Tucker was ordered to report to fire department headquarters, where he was told he had to either report for full duty by November 2, 2012, or face termination. Unable to return to full duty he was terminated on November 2, 2012.

Tucker promptly filed a claim of disability discrimination with the EOOC and the Texas Workforce Commission, who issued a right to sue letter in April. His lawsuit was filed last week alleging disability discrimination under federal and state law, wrongful termination, and retaliation.

Here is a copy of the complaint. Brad-Tucker-v-University-Park


 

Posted in ADA, Civil Suit, Discrimination, EMS, Municipal Liability, Workers Compensation

Tagged , , ,

Chicago Settles Sex Discrimination Suit Over Abilities Test

 

A settlement has been announced in the 2011 gender discrimination case involving the Chicago Fire Department.

The suit, Vasich v. City of Chicago, alleged that the department’s physical abilities test unlawfully discriminated against women because it had a disparate impact on women candidates and was not sufficiently job related.

The lead plaintiff, Samantha Vasich, claims she rigorously prepared for the test, including hiring a personal trainer to assist her, to no avail. The class action suit was filed in federal court.

Attorney Marni Willenson, who represents the plaintiffs, said that under the settlement 138 women who previously failed the physical abilities test will be allowed to reapply or receive a portion of a $2 million payment.

As part of the settlement the city has agreed to adopt the Candidate Physical Ability Test (CPAT), developed by the IAFF.

Despite the fact that the settlement still must be approved by the city council and the judge, the women have been informed that may reapply beginning Monday, May 6, 2013

It is unclear from the news reports whether this settlement will resolve the 2012 suit Godfrey vs. City of Chicago. That suit was brought by twenty African-American female firefighters who where granted a preference under the Lewis v. City of Chicago (race discrimination) settlement, but failed the physical abilities test. All twenty Godfrey plaintiffs are plaintiffs in the Vasich case.

More on the Vasich case.

Posted in Civil Suit, Constitutional Rights, Discrimination, Municipal Liability, Negligence, Politics

Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

Court Upholds $3 million Cut From New Jersey Firefighter’s Verdict

A New Jersey firefighter who was awarded $3.5 million by a jury last year for a whistleblower violation will have to settle for $500,000, according to a three judge panel from the Superior Court Appellate Division.

Ridgewood firefighter Kevin Reilly claims he was passed over for promotion to lieutenant because he reported that his superiors violated safety requirements. In 2012 a superior court jury agreed he was retaliated against, and awarded him $3.5 million in damages.

That verdict was subsequently reduced to $500,000 by Judge Menelaos Toskos who characterized the award as “shockingly high.”

Reilly appealed the reduction and yesterday the Appellate Division affirmed Judge Toskos’s decision calling it “comprehensive and thoughtful.”

More on the story.

Posted in Civil Suit, Municipal Liability, Occupational Safety & Health, Promotions

Tagged , , ,

Settlements Announced in Virginia Double LODD Accident Case

A civil suit arising out of a double LODD apparatus accident in 2010 in Rocky Mount, Virginia, is one step closer to being resolved as two of the three parties have resolved their claims.

The accident occurred on July 26, 2010 when an engine driven by Fire Chief Posey W. Dillon, of the Rocky Mount Fire Department collided in an intersection with a vehicle driven by Teri Anne Valentine. The apparatus was responding on mutual aid to a reported structure fire in a neighboring community.

Chief Dillon and Firefighter William D. Altice died in the accident. Neither were wearing seatbelts and both were ejected. A Virginia State Police investigation concluded that Ms. Valentine had the green light at the time of the accident.

Last year FF Altice’s estate sued Ms. Valentine and Chief Dillion’s estate for $2 million alleging both were grossly negligent in driving their respective vehicles. Chief Dillon’s estate and Ms. Valentine filed cross-claims against each other, each alleging the other was responsible..

The settlement announced today involves the cross claims between Chief Dillon’s estate and Ms. Valentine. The terms of the settlement have not been released.

FF Altice’s suit remains on schedule to be tried in September, 2013.

More on the story.

Posted in Apparatus, Civil Suit, LODD, Municipal Liability, Negligence, Volunteers, Wrongful death

Tagged , ,

Illinois Sexual Harassment Suit Removed to Federal Court

 

An Illinois sexual harassment case originally filed in state court, is now headed to federal court along with some nasty allegations.

Lieutenant Terri Simone Lorenz of the Orland Fire Protection District claims that her sexual harassment problems began shortly after Fire Chief Bryant Krizik and Deputy Chief Joe Madden were placed on administrative leave in May, 2011. She alleges that the newly appointed acting fire chief, Raymond Kay, and Battalion Chief Nicholas Cinquepalmi embarked on a malicious campaign to drive her from the department.

Quoting from the complaint:

Defendants subjected Simone Lorenz to a long standing pattern of discrimination based on her sex (female), retaliation because she complained, and created and perpetuated a hostile work environment, including but not limited to the following:

a.Maintaining pornographic, sexually graphic, and other inappropriate material in the women’s bathroom and in other places in the fire house;

b.Making derogatory comments about women, including about Simone Lorenz, other women firefighters, and other women generally;

c.Singling Simone Lorenz out on drills;

d.Shunning and ostracizing Simone Lorenz and encouraging other firefighters to do the same, which for a firefighter can be a safety issue on fire calls, which are inherently dangerous;

e.Spreading malicious and sexually based rumors about Simone Lorenz;

f.Subjecting Simone Lorenz to unwarranted scrutiny, criticism, and false allegations;

g.Subjecting Simone Lorenz to a notice of interrogation based on false and malicious accusations and without cause, when other employees were not subject to interrogation for similar or more egregious allegations against them;

h.Subjecting Simone Lorenz to unwarranted disciplinary action, and discipline for which male employees were not subjected to for far more egregious allegations made against the male employees; and

i.Denying Simone Lorenz assignments and special projects that she had previously done.

The six-count, 46 page complaint includes some 199 paragraphs, alleging gender discrimination under state and federal law, hostile work environment, retaliation under the Illinois Human Rights Act, discrimination on the basis of union affiliation, and Constitutional violations (42 USC 1983) of the Equal Protection Clause and the First Amendment.

Included in the specifics of the claims:

  • Chief Kay initiated an unwarranted investigation into whether Simone Lorenz cheated on her promotional exam even though she was promoted in 2009, two years before he became the acting chief. The investigation did not result in charges and Simone Lorenz insists the allegations were fabricated.
  • Simone Lorenz received a one day suspension for “giving the finger” to another lieutenant while both were off duty at a union function. The charge was later reversed by an arbitrator who heard testimony that included:
  • [Chief Kay] admitted that he had never recommended or issued discipline for that kind of conduct – except for against Simone Lorenz.
  • Defendant [BC] Cinquepalmi gave “the finger” to Simone Lorenz’s entire crew during roll call, and was never disciplined
  • Defendant [BC] Cinquepalmi instructed [the other lieutenant] to document the incident, so that Defendants could then charge Simone Lorenz with misconduct and discipline, demote her, or fire her from the District
  • Management  admitted that  giving “the finger” to one another commonly occurs “on duty” in the firehouse
  • Simone Lorenz was suspended for 1 day for sending an email to “all users” (subsequently reversed by an arbitrator after it was revealed there was no rule that prohibited it and that others who did the same thing were not disciplined).
  • Repeated requests for help from human resources went largely ignored.

The case was originally filed in Cook County Circuit Court, and was removed to federal court at the request of the Fire Protection District.

Here is a copy of the complaint. Complaint

While there are a number of troubling aspects to the allegations in the compliant, there is one issue that stands out to me that is worth discussing from a leadership perspective: Lt. Simone Lorenz made repeated allegations that male subordinates were rude and disrespectful towards her, and that Chief Kay and Cinquepalmi did nothing to address the insubordination when told.

Who bears the responsibility for this, Lt. Simone Lorenz or the chiefs? Is it enough for a lieutenant in this situation to claim that “they” know about it?

Posted in Civil Suit, Constitutional Rights, Disciplinary Action, Discrimination, First Amendment, Municipal Liability, Sexual Harassment, Sexual misconduct, You Can't Make This Stuff Up

Tagged , ,

Cases in the Fire Law News

I am not sure what is up with our blog platform, but I am truly sorry for the interruptions you may be experiencing. It has been a few days now and things are still not right. In the past we have been attacked by cyber-pests from places like Russia and China so perhaps that continues to be the problem.

At any rate, there are a few stories in the fire law news today. In New York, career firefighters in Garden City have filed suit alleging that the layoff of six firefighters has posed a safety threat to the remaining personnel. More on the story.

In New Hyde Park, New York  a citizen blasted the New Hyde Park Fire Department for “wasting” $11,500 on an “unwarranted” disciplinary hearing of two members. The case involved a commissioner, Michael Dolan Sr., who received a donation of smoke detectors, and claims he took a large number of them to his home for safekeeping. His son. Michael Dolan, Jr., assisting him in moving the detectors.

When asked about the detectors Dolan returned them, but Fire Commissioners Richard Stein brought the matter to the police. While the police declined to press charges, internal charges were brought.  Here’s more on that story.

And in Florida a volunteer fire department has closed its doors following unsuccessful negotiations with the county. The Keystone Heights Volunteer Fire Department, organized in 1925, ceased operations on April 15, 2013. More on the story.

Posted in Civil Suit, Disciplinary Action, Labor Law, Municipal Liability, Politics, Staffing, Volunteers

Tagged , ,

Jacksonville Fire Facing Wrongful Death Suit

The Jacksonville, Florida Fire and Rescue Department is facing a wrongful death lawsuit over the death of a 15 year old baseball player.

On May 15, 2010 Andrew Cohn was playing at Dinsmore Park when he collided with a runner at first base. The collision is believed to have caused an irregular heart rhythm leading to cardiac arrest.

His family claims that Jacksonville Fire and Rescue was negligent in their response. Crews were initially delayed due to a train blocking their route, and failed to promptly notify dispatch. Crews then allegedly wasted vital time due to a locked gate and inexplicably standing in the outfield before attending to Andrew.

According to Andrew’s father, Harold Cohn, "The crowd was just shrill, yelling at them to jump the fence, go around, hurry. There were two or three occasions I look up in the outfield and saw two people standing there with medical bags just standing there looking and peering out here."

Harold also claims the crews did not bring a defibrillator with them, and then lied on a report about using one. Since the accident, the Cohns have been very active is fundraising to support AED purchases for schools and recreational areas. The have told reporters that any damages they receive will go toward purchasing more AEDs.

video platformvideo managementvideo solutionsvideo player

Posted in Civil Suit, EMS, Municipal Liability, Negligence, Wrongful death

Tagged , , , ,

Scottish Fire Rescue Service Facing Criminal Charges Over LODD

The death of a Scottish firefighter four years ago has led to criminal charges being brought against his department. FF Ewan Williamson of the Lothian and Borders Fire and Rescue Service was killed on July 12, 2009 in Edinburgh while fighting a fire in a bar. During the fire twenty people were rescue from apartments above the bar.

Williamson’s family filed a 700,000 pound sterling ($1 million) damage claim against the department last year, claiming watch commander Tim Foley failed to recognize the warning signs of a “backdraught”, and did not provide Williamson sufficient rehab time between entries. They also allege that ventilating windows in the bar contributed to Williamson’s death.

Williamson is believed to have made an initial entry with his crew into the building and come out to replenish his air supply. It was during his second entry that an evacuation order was given. While everyone else made it out safely, Williamson radioed Foley "I'll be there in a minute, boss, I think I'm stuck in a toilet." He followed that transmission by another reporting: "I'm stuck. I'm stuck." His body later was found in a bathroom.

According to pleadings submitted by Williamson’s family:

  • "On ascending the stairs for the second time, he was confused and suffering from heat exhaustion… he turned towards the toilets instead of towards the entrance of the bar"
  • "Ventilating the fire by smashing windows … made the task of those fighting the fire in the basement more dangerous"
  • "Mr Foley failed to exercise reasonable care for the safety of the deceased and by his failures caused the death of the deceased."

According to news reports Williamson’s family has offered to "freeze" their civil claim if the Crown Office agrees to prosecute “anyone” over his death.

Two formal charges were filed against the fire department on April 9, 2013, one for breaching Section 2 of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 and the other for breaching Regulation 3 of the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999, by failing to carrying out risk assessments.

The charges have been brought against the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service, who took over the Lothian and Borders Fire and Rescue Service on April 1, 2013.

More on the story, including video coverage.

Posted in Civil Suit, Criminal Law, International, LODD, Municipal Liability, Negligence, Occupational Safety & Health, Wrongful death

Tagged , , , , , ,

Washington Firefighters Victorious In Retaliation Suit

Seven firefighters from Pullman, Washington have been awarded $1 million in damages in a mind-boggling case worthy of a novel, if not a movie. The case included allegations of a workplace affair, vindictive retaliation, sexual harassment, an officer asking subordinates to provide naked photos of their wives, and counter allegations of a vengeful witch hunt by city officials against union officials.

The lawsuit was brought by Captain Eric Reiber, president of Pullman Firefighters IAFF Local 1892, and six other members who claim they were wrongly disciplined for standing up for Captain Reiber. The suit alleges due process violations, First Amendment violations, conspiracy, defamation, false light privacy violations, intentional infliction of severe emotional distress (outrage), and a state law retaliation claim.

Captain Reiber alleges that one of his subordinates, a female, was having an affair with a married firefighter and that the relationship was creating turmoil in the workplace. When he reported the affair, the pair fabricated allegations of misconduct by Captain Reiber. The fire chief and the city allegedly seized on the allegations as an opportunity to weaken the union’s bargaining position and retaliate against Captain Reiber for his past union activities.

The 28 page complaint can be downloaded here – in two parts. It is a very interesting read.

Part I  Reiber v Pullman -1.pl

Part 2  Reiber v Pullman -2.pl

Between the allegations and counter allegations, we will never know where the truth lies. However, the case points out the importance of conducting a thorough and impartial investigation when firefighters are accused of misconduct.

Among the mistakes made by the Pullman Fire Department in investigating the allegations and imposing discipline – at least according to the complaint:

  • The fire chief instructed a member to prepare a written statement implicating Captain Reiber. When it did not provide “sufficiently negative” information, the chief directed the member to redo the statement incorporating negative comments the chief supplied.
  • The fire chief and the city’s investigator developed a list of “highly inflammatory and suggestive” questions that were given to a large number of employees about the Captain Reiber “making sexual comments and leering overtures to women”. The questions together with his suspension created the impression “that City officials already held evidence of serious wrongdoing”. One question in particular "Have you or anyone you know ever been requested to provide Captain Eric Reiber with sexually suggestive photos?" allegedly defamed Captain Reiber. The questioning of the employees coincided with contentious contract negotiations.
  • When Captain Reiber’s accusers made their claims the investigators did not require them “to provide any specifics as to what was said, or when” and the city “exercised no diligence whatsoever in ascertaining the context or assessing the truthfulness of these charges. Their failure to properly investigate was willful and malicious.’
  • At Captain Reiber’s disciplinary hearing on the original charges the city “refused to allow testimony from the many Local 1892 members present and announced that they would accept only written submissions in support of Reiber.”
  • Following the hearing the city sent the union a letter threatening “members with discipline should they question the allegations” by submitting written statements in support of Captain Reiber’s version of the events.
  • During the grievance arbitration that followed Captain Reiber’s demotion and discipline it was disclosed that the city “willfully withheld … a document seminal to the investigation …. The City's willful concealment of evidence constitute[d a] deprivation of Reiber's due process rights”
  • After disciplining Captain Reiber for his original alleged misconduct, the city then took disciplinary action against him and six firefighters who submitted written statements on his behalf alleging that Captain Reiber’s defense – which contradicted the allegations of his accusers – constituted unlawful retaliation against the accusers.

The six day jury trial in US District Court ended with a verdict in favor of Captain Reiber for $325,800 and $135,000 each to Rudy Fisher, Christopher Volk, John Gollnick, Jason Wilkins and Christopher Wehrung. The jury delivered the verdict on April 2, 2013.

The city of Pullman and the estate of Fire Chief Pat Wilkins were held liable. Chief Wilkins passed away last year while the case was pending. Other city officials, including the city’s HR director who served as the primary investigator, were not held personally liable.

For those who have been through the Fire Department Administrative Investigations and Enforcing Discipline Program, this case is certainly one to study for your ongoing professional development. Many of the best practices we discuss in class were not followed and the consequences are evident in the verdict.

More on the story.

 

Posted in Civil Suit, Constitutional Rights, Disciplinary Action, Discrimination, First Amendment, Labor Law, Municipal Liability, Politics, Professional Standards, Sexual Harassment, Sexual misconduct, Uncategorized, You Can't Make This Stuff Up

Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

Montana Chief Sues for Wrongful Discharge

A former assistant chief in Montana has filed suit claiming he was wrongfully terminated in part because he cooperated with an investigation that led to the arrest and conviction of his former boss.

Assistant Chief Brian Crandell of the Central Valley Fire District was terminated on February 12, 2013 following two months of efforts by district officials said to be friends of former fire chief Brett M. Waters to force him to resign.

According to the complaint:

In the summer of 2010, the former Fire Chief of the Central Valley Fire District, Brett M. Waters, was investigated for theft of thousands of dollars from CVFD and official misconduct by the Montana Department of Justice Division of Criminal Investigation.

Plaintiff, along with at least two other employees of CVFD, reported pubIic policy violations and crimes by Waters to State investigators, and cooperated with the investigation of Waters. Waters later resigned from his position as Fire Chief with CVFD. Waters was charged with felony theft and official misconduct and ultimately pleaded guilty to official misconduct. He admitted that he had taken nearly $50,000 and agreed to pay it back.

During his tenure, Waters selected people to apply for appointment or run for election to the Board of Trustees for CVFD. Many of them continue a friendship with Waters. Mike Wachter, Gil Moore, and Ken Walker are members of the Board of Trustees whom Waters selected.

During the period of the investigation of Waters' criminal activity in 2010, CYFD Trustee Walker referred to the concerns raised about Waters' theft as “BS," and Trustee Moore referred to Plaintiff and other employees who reported the crimes as "chaff' at Board meetings.

In December, 2012, Fire Chief Ron Lindroth and Fire District board chairman Mike Wachter met with Chief Crandell to seek his resignation.

Wachter began this meeting by stating, "we are brother firefighters, and friends and instructors, and this is really hard." Wachter stated that Lindroth recommended "downsizing" and "eliminating [Crandell’s] position" and "it's the consensus of the Board to follow the Chiefs recommendations."

Lindroth then presented Plaintiff with a "severance agreement" which included a provision that he would give up his rights to sue for full legal redress. The agreement did not provide for anything but payment of wages and benefits he had already earned. Lindroth called it a "safety net" and told Plaintiff he should "find some other employment."

Lindroth told Plaintiff he wanted the agreement signed before the December Board meeting, and said that the "consideration" in the agreement would be better for Plaintiff jf he signed before the meeting. Plaintiff did not sign.

On December 13, 2012, Lindroth held a staff meeting and described his proposed "reorganization." The reorganization included eliminating Plaintiffs position and adding new positions, including company officer positions. Plaintiff is qualified to do company officer work. CVFD never offered him such a position.

On February 12, 2013, the CVFD held its monthly Board meeting. Plaintiff was in attendance, as he always was. Without notice to Plaintiff for to the public, as required bylaw, and without closing the meeting to protect his privacy, the Board voted to fire Plaintiff. Wachter publicly handed Plaintiff another unsigned "Severance Agreement." After the meeting, Wachter approached Plaintiff, took the "agreement" back and signed it. Plaintiff has never signed it, and never negotiated for it.

The complaint characterizes the reorganization plan as a pretext for Chief Crandell’s termination, and alleges that the fire district acted with actual malice in violating Montana's Wrongful Discharge from Employment Act. The complaint also alleges that Chief Crandell was wrongfully denied overtime compensation

Besides the two counts mentioned above, it would also appear that Chief Crandell’s legal team have at least three additional charges teed up and ready to drive if they need them, including:

  1. Whistleblower retaliation
  2. Due process violation (lack of notice and opportunity to be heard)
  3. Open meetings violation (lack of notice)

I am thinking they won’t need them!

Here is a copy of the complaint.  Crandell v Central Valley

Posted in Civil Suit, Disciplinary Action, Discrimination, Municipal Liability, Open Meetings Laws, Politics, Wrongful termination

Tagged , , ,

Ohio Widow Appeals Dismissal of Wrongful Death Suit

An Ohio widow who blames the fire department for her husband’s death is appealing the dismissal of her wrongful death lawsuit.

Ronda Cushing claims the Sheffield Lake Fire Department failed to rescue her husband Tony, 62, following a vehicle accident and fire on October 2, 2010. Tony Cushing is believed to have blacked out while driving due to a medical condition. He crashed into a house trapping and injuring several occupants.  The house and the car caught fire and Tony perished before firefighters could extricate him.

Ronda’s lawsuit was dismissed by Lorain County Common Pleas Court last month. In a separate action, she also sued the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland Clinic Heath System and Cleveland Clinic Health System Physician Organization for the wrongful death of her husband, claiming they should have restricted his driving privileges due to his known medical conditions.

Here is more on the story.

Posted in Civil Suit, Municipal Liability, Negligence, Wrongful death

Tagged , , ,

Phoenix Deputy Chief Claims Harassment and Retaliation

A deputy chief from Phoenix, Arizona has filed a rather unusual sexual harassment suit against the department: he claims that he was harassed by members and retaliated against by the department because he reprimanded officers who allowed sexually inappropriate drawings and items to be displayed in a fire station.

The case began in November, 2009, when Deputy Chief Frank Cheatham observed “several inappropriate, sexually suggestive drawings and items—specifically, two depictions of a penis and testicles—openly displayed in the workplace at Fire Station 1.” At the time Chief Cheatham was the South Side Shift commander, in charge of roughly 440 firefighters. He “admonished the supervisors at Fire Station 1 that such drawings were inappropriate and would not be tolerated in the future.”

Thereafter, Chief Cheatham was informed he was no longer welcome at meals at the station, and that “the firefighters at Fire Station 1 would never trust Chief Cheatham’s assistant again and considered him to be a spy for Chief Cheatham.”

Chief Cheatham claims that he then subjected to harassment, including:

  • “a t-shirt bearing another drawing of a penis and testicles [being] draped over a piece of gym equipment” where he was working out;
  • “a large brown envelope in interoffice mail containing two small pieces of pasta, one of which resembled a penis and the other of which resembled a vagina. … The piece of pasta resembling a vagina had Chief Cheatham’s first name (“Frank”) written on it.”
  • “rumors … that he would be removed from his position as Deputy Chief Shift Commander of South Shift Command.”

In March, 2010 Chief Cheatham was involuntarily transferred to the safety division, an assignment that he referred to as having “less favorable working hours … than the hours that he enjoyed in his position as Deputy Fire Chief Shift Commander of South Shift Command… and far less prestige…”

The complaint characterizes the transfer as retaliation, and demotion. It claims ‘The City of Phoenix Fire Department is engaging in a pattern and practice of retaliating against its employees who complain of discrimination in the workplace…. [and that the] harassment and retaliation summarized above had a substantial negative impact on Chief Cheatham's employment and psychological wellbeing and continue to do so.”

Here is a copy of the suit, filed last week in US District Court in Phoenix. Cheatham v Phoenix

Posted in Civil Suit, Constitutional Rights, Disciplinary Action, Discrimination, Municipal Liability, Sexual Harassment, Sexual misconduct, You Can't Make This Stuff Up

Tagged , , , , , , , ,

EEOC Settles Another NY LOSAP Age Discrimination Suit

The US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has announced the settlement of yet another age-discrimination lawsuit against volunteer fire departments in New York involving their length of service award programs (LOSAP).

The suit was brought by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), against The Village of North Syracuse, the Town of Cicero and the Town of Clay, as well as the North Syracuse Fire Department, the Cicero Fire Department, the Clay Volunteer Fire Department, the Moyers Corner Fire Department, and the Cicero Fire District.

The defendants have agreed to pay an undisclosed amount to their firefighters who lost pension benefits, including several who will receive increased future monthly pension amounts.

The suit is similar to at least ten others (by my count) filed by the EEOC since 2006 alleging that the LOSAP programs violate the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) because they prohibit active members over a certain age from continuing to accrue LOSAP pension benefits.

Here is the full text of the EEOC press release:

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                                          CONTACT:

April 2, 2013                                                                          

Michael J. O'Brien, Senior Trial Attorney  212-336-3694

Bryan D. White, Program Analyst    347-213-8821 

TTY: (212) 336-3622

 

VILLAGE OF NORTH SYRACUSE AND TOWNS OF CICERO AND CLAY SETTLE EEOC AGE DISCRIMINATION SUIT

Older Volunteer Firefighters Denied Service Credit Due to Ageism, Federal Agency Charged

            NEW YORK – The Village of North Syracuse, the Town of Cicero and the Town of Clay have agreed to settle a class age discrimination lawsuit brought by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the agency announced today.  Those localities, as well as the North Syracuse Fire Department, the Cicero Fire Department, the Clay Volunteer Fire Depart­ment, the Moyers Corner Fire Department, and the Cicero Fire District, will pay a group of firefighters lost pension benefits as well as provide several firefighters increased future monthly pension amounts.

            The EEOC's suit had charged that from the early 1990s through the late 2000s, the eight defendants had refused to let volunteer firefighters accrue credit toward a "length of service award program" (LOSAP), the equivalent of a retirement pension, because of their age, either 60 or 62 depending on the fire department.  As a result, senior firefighters lost pension amounts, in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), a federal law that protects workers age 40 and older from age discrimination.  Although North Syracuse, Cicero, and Clay had amended the LOSAPs to allow firefighters to earn credit without regard to age, the amend­ment did not provide for lost benefits.  The EEOC filed suit, No. 12-cv-1265, after first attempt­ing to reach a pre-litigation settlement.

            Under the terms of the agreement, North Syracuse, Clay, Cicero, and the Fire District have agreed to provide the EEOC with contact information for affected firefighters, and the EEOC will contact the firefighters to ascertain lost pension amounts.  U.S. Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks in Syracuse will oversee the process.

            "The brave men and women who volunteered to fight fires deserve to be treated equally, without regard to age," said EEOC Trial Attorney Michael J. O'Brien.  "We welcome the decision to settle this case in a way that ensures that these firefighters, who do heroic work, do not receive different retirement benefits simply because of their age."

Elizabeth Grossman, the EEOC's regional attorney in New York, added, "This case should remind all employers, including municipalities, that federal law prohibits targeting older workers for discriminatory treatment, including in relation to pensions or retirement benefits."

            The EEOC enforces federal laws banning workplace discrimination.  Further information about the agency is available at www.eeoc.gov

Posted in Civil Suit, Discrimination, Municipal Liability, Politics, Volunteers

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Stroke Victim Sues Illinois Fire Department

An Illinois woman has filed suit against the Aurora Fire Department claiming the failure of three paramedics to properly diagnose her stroke caused her to suffer permanent injuries.

Susan Miller filed the suit in Kane County Circuit Court last week. She claims that paramedics assumed she was intoxicated when she was actually having a stroke.

Miller called 911 at 2:00am on May 28, 2012, for numbness in her arm and because she fell and could not get up.  She alleges the medics examined for only "six minutes" during which time she admitted to having consumed alcohol earlier in the day.

The medics left her with instructions to “sleep it off”. Three hours later her husband transported her to an emergency room, but the damage was done. According to the complaint:

  • "As a result in the delay in receiving the proper medical treatment for her stroke, Miller suffered and continues to suffer from various injuries including but not limited to permanent facial paralysis, vision loss and one-sided paralysis. "
  • "The defendant's utter indifferent or conscious disregard for the safety of Miller is evident from defendant's failure to discover a danger through recklessness or carelessness and which could have been discovered with the exercise of ordinary care."

More on the story.

Posted in Civil Suit, Duty to Act, EMS, Municipal Liability, Negligence

Tagged , , , , ,

Firefighter Claims Injuries Due To Lack of Bail Out System

 

A Kingston, New York firefighter injured in the line of duty last December, has filed a notice of claim stating that his injuries were the result of the department’s failure to provide him with a bail-out system.

Firefighters Thomas Metzger and Brian Renn were injured on December 29, 2012 they bailed out of the second floor window onto a porch roof, and fell to the ground because the roof was icy. FF Metzger claims his injuries were due to the  department's negligence in failing to issue personnel a bail out system.

While the story line is interesting, of even more interest is the reaction of Kingston’s  mayor, Shayne Gallo, upon reading the allegations. Please watch the video below for a little comic relief.

To understand what has transpired legally – all states have adopted laws called tort claims acts. These laws require that before an injured party can sue a governmental entity in tort, they must first file an administrative claim with the governmental agency. Such a claim is NOT a lawsuit – but it is a necessary step before someone can actually file suit.

The purpose of this step is to give the governmental agency the chance to review the allegations and possibly settle the claim before the case goes to court.

Posted in Civil Suit, Line of Duty, Municipal Liability, Negligence, Occupational Safety & Health, Workers Compensation

Tagged , , , , , , ,

Buffalo LODD Suits Settle for $4.1 Million

It appears that a settlement has been reached in two separate lawsuits arising out of the LODDs of two Buffalo firefighters in 2009.

Lt. Charles W. “Chip” McCarthy, 45, and FF Jonathan S. Croom, 34, were killed on August 24, 2009 in the basement of a commercial building. Their families filed wrongful death lawsuits against the city of Buffalo, Mayor Byron W. Brown, former Fire Commissioner Michael S. Lombardo and the owners of the Genesee Street deli-warehouse.

Here are the links to the prior posts about the fire and the suits: October 17, 2010 and November 23, 2010.

The settlement calls for payments to the families of both firefighters totaling $4.1 million and health insurance coverage for FF Croom’s minor children. Lt. McCarthy’s children are adults. The agreement also calls for safety changes in the Buffalo Fire Department.

Attorney Thomas H. Burton, a former police officer who represents the McCarthy family, was quoted by The Buffalo News as saying: “Wrongful-death lawsuits are traditionally about money damages for surviving family members. Here, we went further and insisted on multiple safety procedures for firefighters in the future.”

Safety changes include:

  • Complying with the “two in, two out rule”
  • Assigning an accountability officer at “serious fires”
  • Improved radios, SCBAs and TICs

The settlement does not affect the suits pending against the building owners.

More on the story.

Posted in Civil Suit, LODD, Municipal Liability, Negligence, Occupational Safety & Health, Wrongful death

Tagged , , , , , , , ,

Two Feuds in the Fire Law News

There are two fire department feuds in the fire law news today, one in Louisiana and the other in Pennsylvania.

In Louisiana, a dispute between elected officials in two communities threatens to disrupt emergency services in the City of Broussard.

Lafayette City-Parish President Joey Durel says that if Broussard Mayor Charles Langlinais refuses to drop a lawsuit over the annexation of a golf course, he will block the renewal an agreement for the Lafayette Fire Department to provide dispatch services for the Broussard Fire Department.

The agreement is set to expire at the end of April, and will potentially leave residents of Broussard with no way to obtain fire and rescue services.

The political finger pointing is going hot and heavy. Mayor Langlinais accuses President Durel of playing politics with peoples safety, and his attorney Gerald deLaunay told reporters "By trying to deny emergency fire service to family homes, schools and nursing homes, Mr. Durel and those who support him show their willingness to sacrifice human life for political reasons."

Not to be outdone President Durel replied "There is no health and safety issue here. … Anyone who says that is distorting the truth to the citizens of Broussard. If they truly believe there is a health and safety issue and they don't drop the lawsuit, that should outrage the people of Broussard. Life is full of choices. Their choice is lawsuit or services."

Politics, Louisiana style. Here is more on the story.

In Pennsylvania, an ongoing dispute in Bensalem Township made its way into federal court when a former fire chief and his son filed suit against township officials alleging false arrest, malicious prosecution, and violation of constitutional rights.

The suit was filed by David Jerri Sr., the former chief of the Union Fire Company, and his son, David Jr., who was charged with fraud over an alleged fire department workers comp claim. He was acquitted of all charges.

The men accuse Bensalem Township director of public safety Frederick Harran, of directing police to fabricate a story to substantiate the criminal charge. The suit also alleges that Harran twice shut down the fire company termorarily.

Here is more on the story.

Posted in Civil Suit, Constitutional Rights, Municipal Liability, Politics, Volunteers

Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

Maryland Medic Loses Wrongful Termination Suit

A Maryland paramedic has lost his bid to have his termination overturned. Norris Phillip Donohoe Jr. was terminated from his employment for the Town of Berlin last year following allegations by two EMS coworkers of harassment.

Donohoe claims he has never been disciplined in 23 years with the Berlin Fire Company and that the allegations came as a shock to him.  He also alleges that the town of Berlin lacks the authority to discipline or fire him because he works for the fire company not the town.

To understand the legal landscape, Donohoe is an employee of the Berlin Fire Company. Under a 2009 agreement between the fire company and the town, fire company EMS personnel were leased to the town in order to make them eligible for state retirement and benefits.

The town claims the “lease” arrangement makes the paid EMS personnel subject to the same personnel policies as other town employees. Donohoe disagrees claiming that he reports to the president of the Berlin Fire Company and the fire chief. At issue appears to be the town’s anti-harassment policies and the authority of HR to investigate and discipline violations.

Donohoe was terminated last May, and filed suit last July naming Mayor Gee Williams, Berlin’s five council members, and Town Administrator Tony Carson. The situation became so tenuous that in August the town council voted to suspended all payments to the fire company

Yesterday, Worcester County Circuit Court Judge David B. Mitchell granted the town’s motion to dismiss the case. News reports indicate that the judge based his ruling on rather peculiar grounds: sovereign immunity.

Having not seen the ruling, I am at a loss to explain how sovereign immunity (normally raised as a defense in tort actions) would find its way into a wrongful termination case, let alone serve as an absolute defense. Most states have severely limited the application of sovereign immunity – with a number of states finding it to be unconstitutional. Furthermore, most wrongful termination cases are based on contract law – an area where sovereign immunity long ago ceased to be an issue.

Here is more on this ruling.

Donohoe’s attorney Robin Cockey is vowing to appeal.

Incidentally – if sovereign immunity applies to municipalities in Maryland for contract-based claims… why would anyone risk doing business with a municipality? With sovereign immunity applied to contracts a municipality would effectively be immune from having to pay the debts they incur. The thought of it is so bizarre – that there must be something else going on. If any of our Maryland friends have inside info – please fill us in.

Posted in Disciplinary Action, EMS, Municipal Liability, Politics, Uncategorized, Volunteers, Wrongful termination

Tagged , , , ,

NYC Trial Over Treatment of Disabled During Emergencies Begins Today

 

A class action lawsuit filed by a disability rights group against the city of New York began today. The suit alleges that the needs and rights of the disabled are routinely violated during emergencies and disasters.

The suit was filed by Disability Rights Advocates in 2011 alleging that the city does not do enough to address the needs and safety of the disabled during disasters. Testimony is expected to focus on the city's alleged failure to properly locate and rescue disabled people during several recent weather related events, including Tropical Storm Irene and Super Storm Sandy.

Lawyers for Disability Rights Advocates say the group is not seeking monetary damages, but rather wants to see disaster planning do a better job of addressing disability related matters. The federal court trial is expected to take two weeks.

More on the story.

Posted in ADA, Civil Suit, Discrimination, Municipal Liability, Politics

Tagged ,

Georgia Firefighter Settles Sexual Harassment Case for $350k

There has been a settlement in the case of a Peachtree City, Georgia firefighter who alleged that her fire chief had pressured her to have sex with him.

As we reported last December, Peachtree Fire Chief Edwin Eiswerth was accused of repeatedly propositioning Martine Piers. Within hours of the allegations becoming public, Chief Eiswerth announced his retirement effective January 1, 2013.

The settlement calls for Piers to receive $350,000, with $300,000 being paid by Georgia Interlocal Risk Management Agency (GIRMA), the city’s insurer, and $50,000 paid by the city.

In exchange, Piers has agreed to dismiss her complaint with the EEOC, and relinquish her right to file future lawsuits over the matter.

More on the story.

Posted in Civil Suit, Constitutional Rights, Disciplinary Action, Discrimination, Municipal Liability, Sexual Harassment, Sexual misconduct, You Can't Make This Stuff Up

Tagged , , ,

Ohio FD Tagged for $1.7 Million in Sex Discrimination Suit

 

An Ohio jury has awarded a former female firefighter $1.7 million for sex discrimination. They also ordered her Lieutenant to pay $75,000 for his role in the case.

Raechel Sterud, 32, alleged that Orange Township Fire Department and her officer, Lieutenant Keith Myers, discriminated against her leading to her termination in January, 2008. She was still on probation at the time.

Sterud claims that she complained to Lt. Meyers about being harassed, and that not only did he fail to address it, he maliciously recommended her termination prior to her completing probation and having union protection.

In the trial, a key piece of evidence was an email from a firefighter to Lt. Meyers that warned that Sterud planned to file a formal complaint once she had union protection. Sterud was terminated two weeks prior to her completion of probation.

There was also testimony that:

  • during sexual-harassment training, videos were shown on a split screen television so firefighters also could watch a NASCAR race;
  • one firefighter told other firefighters that he transferred to work with Sterud so he could sleep with her;
  • the same firefighter moved his sleeping quarters closer to Sterud’s and persisted in using the fire station’s womans’ bathroom.

The case was tried last week with the verdict being rendered this week.

More on the story.

Posted in Civil Suit, Constitutional Rights, Discrimination, Municipal Liability, Sexual Harassment

Tagged , ,

Pittsburgh Settles FLSA Overtime Suit By Officers

The city of Pittsburgh has settled a class action lawsuit filed in federal court by fire officers claiming they were wrongfully denied overtime compensation.

The suit was originally brought last August by Deputy Chief Harry Scherer, Battalion Chief Robert Cox and Captain Edmund J. Farley under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The officers claim they were wrongfully denied overtime for hours worked in excess of 212 in a 28 day period (or an average of 53 hours per week).

The city’s position was the officers were exempt supervisory employees ineligible for overtime. However, under revisions to the FLSA in 2004, virtually all line firefighting positions must be treated as hourly positions.

Over fifty other fire fighters subsequently joined the suit. The case was recently assigned for mediation prior to the settlement being announced. The exact terms of the settlement have not been released, nor do they appear in any court documents.

The suit sought back pay going back three years, the maximum FLSA allows recovery for. The city had settled a similar lawsuit in 2011 filed by police officers,  paying more than $900,000 in penalties and attorneys’ fees.

Here is a copy of the original complaint. Pittsburgh

The department has been in the news lately as local officials struggle to cope with overspending on overtime. Given that the department is 140 firefighters short, the overtime problem should come as no surprise. Of course that does not stop some politicians from placing the blame on the firefighters…


 

 

Posted in Civil Suit, FLSA, Municipal Liability, Politics, Wage and Hour

Tagged , ,