Discrimination Suit Against Rochester MN Fire Tossed, But Coincidence is Strange

The Rochester, Minnesota Fire Department has prevailed in a discrimination suit brought by a native American candidate and a female candidate. The decision was issued by the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals on June 1, 2011, ending a roughly five year legal battle.

David Jaye Torgerson, a member of the Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians, and Jami Kay Mundell, allege they were discriminated against in the hiring process for the Rochester Fire Department in 2006 and 2007. The fire department hired 7 firefighters in 2006 and 5 in 2007. Mundell placed 40th and Torgerson ranked 45th.

There’s an interesting (mmmm… strange is probably a better term) coincidence involving this case and another case in the news. Some of the plaintiffs’ accusations of wrongdoing involve decisions made by the then Rochester Fire Chief, David A. Kapler. That is the same Chief Kapler who was the fire chief in Alameda, California until last year. Some allege he is responsible for the 2009 decision to eliminate the fire department’s water rescue program due to a lack of funding. That decision led to a highly controversial incident last Monday where Alameda firefighters, prohibited by their department regulations from going in the water, essentially stood by as a suicidal man drown.

Here is a copy of the decision. Torgerson v. Rochester

The court does a great job of detailing the hiring process and the conduct of the oral interviews. Certainly, it is worth reviewing for chiefs who are involved in organizing oral interviews and selection processes that utilize the rule of three.

The process, which the court upheld, allowed for a modification of the rule of three to permit the inclusion of up to two eligible candidates from each “protected group” for which a disparity exists between the make-up of the Fire department and the City’s affirmative action goals.

One of the central challenges in the case was Chief Kapler’s use of different standards for different candidates. However in the final analysis the court concluded:

In light of the undisputed facts, no reasonable jury could find that Torgerson and Mundell were similarly situated in all relevant respects to the hired candidates. Thus, no reasonable jury could find that the different Fire-Chief-interview standards demonstrate pretext for discrimination.

The 8th Circuit upheld the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of the city.

About Curt Varone

Curt Varone has over 45 years of fire service experience and 35 as a practicing attorney licensed in both Rhode Island and Maine. His background includes 29 years as a career firefighter in Providence (retiring as a Deputy Assistant Chief), as well as volunteer and paid on call experience. He is the author of two books: Legal Considerations for Fire and Emergency Services, (2006, 2nd ed. 2011, 3rd ed. 2014, 4th ed. 2022) and Fire Officer's Legal Handbook (2007), and is a contributing editor for Firehouse Magazine writing the Fire Law column.
x

Check Also

Court Refuses to Dismiss Due Process Demotion Case

A Wisconsin fire captain who was demoted in 2021 when the city reorganized its promotional process, got a mixed decision in his federal court lawsuit. Richard Haffner claims that Fire Chief Joshua Bell, the City of New Richmond, and the City’s Police and Fire Commission violated his due process rights by removing him as a captain without cause or a hearing.

UK Parliament Questions Fire Service Leader on Institutional Racism Claim

As have many fire departments in the UK and Canada recently, the Dorset and Wiltshire Fire and Rescue Authority has been in the news relative to allegations of institutional racism and sexism. However, when questioned by Lee Anderson, a member of parliament, the chair of the Authority, Rebecca Knox, was unable to answer some relatively simple questions about the decision to label her organization “institutionally racist.”